University of Missouri–St. Louis
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
Papers in
-
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 154
- Virology 128
- Top scholars
- Robert E. RicklefsFrank MossElizabeth Anne KelloggPatricia A. ResickJames F. CampbellJames A. BreaughNigam P. RathXuemin Wang
- Journals
- Journal of Organometallic Chemistry (84 papers)Organometallics (78 papers)Criminology (75 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (65 papers)American Journal of Botany (55 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
University of Missouri–St. Louis
11.7k papers receiving 422.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 17.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 23.8k
- Clinical Psychology 24.7k
- Ecological Modeling 2.4k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 9.8k
Countries citing scholars working at University of Missouri–St. Louis
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Missouri–St. Louis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Missouri–St. Louis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Missouri–St. Louis more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Missouri–St. Louis
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Missouri–St. Louis at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Missouri–St. Louis at the time of their publication.
About University of Missouri–St. Louis
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Missouri–St. Louis have published 12.2k papers, which have received a total of 424.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 650 papers in Clinical Psychology, 128 papers in Virology, 487 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 889 papers in Organic Chemistry and 1.2k papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (368 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (206 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (187 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (154 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (154 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (153 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (151 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (150 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (17.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (23.8k citations), Clinical Psychology (24.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.4k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (9.8k citations). Authors at University of Missouri–St. Louis collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Organometallics, Criminology, Tetrahedron Letters and American Journal of Botany. Some of University of Missouri–St. Louis's most productive authors include Robert E. Ricklefs, Frank Moss, Elizabeth Anne Kellogg, Patricia A. Resick, James F. Campbell, James A. Breaugh, Nigam P. Rath, Xuemin Wang, Robert J. Marquis and Alexei V. Demchenko.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.