Columbia University

11.4M citations
229.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Columbia University

201.3k papers receiving 10.2M citations

Peers

Columbia University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 593.7k
  • Molecular Biology 2.0M
  • Clinical Psychology 541.1k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 105.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 480.4k
Replace Yale University with:
Yale University United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
Cornell University United States
New York University United States
McGill University Canada
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey United States
University of Toronto Canada
Harvard University United States
Boston University United States
Columbia University relative to Yale University United States Yale University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yale University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Columbia University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Columbia University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Columbia University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Columbia University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Columbia University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Columbia University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Columbia University at the time of their publication.

About Columbia University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Columbia University have published 229.1k papers, which have received a total of 11.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8.8k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 9.7k papers in Clinical Psychology, 8.1k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7.8k papers in Atmospheric Science and 28.7k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Climate variability and models (3.1k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3.1k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3.0k papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2.8k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2.5k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2.1k papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1.9k papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (1.8k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (593.7k citations), Molecular Biology (2.0M citations), Clinical Psychology (541.1k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (105.0k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (480.4k citations). Authors at Columbia University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature, Science and PLoS ONE. Some of Columbia University's most productive authors include Robert L. Spitzer, Andrew Gelman, Yaakov Stern, Janet B. W. Williams, Kurt Kroenke, R. D. Mindlin, Ilan H. Meyer, Eric R. Kandel, James Hone and Brent R. Stockwell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact