University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

30.0k papers receiving 901.9k citations

Peers

University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Social Psychology 51.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 26.1k
  • Clinical Psychology 48.7k
  • Structural Biology 3.5k
  • Strategy and Management 36.4k
Replace University of Notre Dame with:
University of Notre Dame United States
University of Illinois System United States
University of Illinois Chicago United States
Northern Illinois University United States
Wayne State University United States
Iowa State University United States
Michigan United United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
University of Cincinnati United States
Case Western Reserve University United States
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee relative to University of Notre Dame United States University of Notre Dame's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
University of Notre Dame · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee at the time of their publication.

About University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee have published 33.8k papers, which have received a total of 982.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 106 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 681 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 980 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1.5k papers in Clinical Psychology and 109 papers in Structural Biology on the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (520 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (408 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (400 papers), Plant and animal studies (311 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (307 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (305 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (300 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (295 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Social Psychology (51.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (26.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (48.7k citations), Structural Biology (3.5k citations) and Strategy and Management (36.4k citations). Authors at University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Surface Science, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, PLoS ONE, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Great Lakes Research. Some of University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee's most productive authors include Mohsen Bahmani‐Óskooee, George W. Hanson, Leonard Parker, Junhong Chen, Satish Nambisan, Pradeep K. Rohatgi, Mike Allen, Kenneth H. Nealson, Mark D. Schwartz and Johnmarshall Reeve.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact