Countries where authors publish in Organometallics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Organometallics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Organometallics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organometallics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Organometallics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Organometallics.
About Organometallics
The 29.9k papers published in Organometallics in the last decades have received a total of 1.0M indexed citations . Papers published in Organometallics usually cover Inorganic Chemistry (14.6k papers), Organic Chemistry (26.2k papers), Process Chemistry and Technology (2.6k papers), Pharmaceutical Science (1.1k papers) and Catalysis (951 papers) specifically the topics of Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (16.0k papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (6.6k papers), Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (5.7k papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (4.1k papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3.9k papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (3.9k papers), Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry (3.4k papers) and Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (2.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Organometallics are Dietmar Seyferth, Arnold L. Rheingold, Steven P. Nolan, Robert H. Grubbs, Miguel A. Esteruelas, John E. Bercaw, Richard R. Schrock, Maurice Brookhart, Robert G. Bergman and Robert H. Crabtree.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.