United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
Impact in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
- Metals and Alloys top 5%
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 843
- Radiation 442
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 370
- Top scholars
- J. M. HammersleySimon BroadbentJohn Bryan TaylorJohn Henry GittusBernard Thomas KellyBrian TomkinsR. S. PeaseThomas Stringer
- Journals
- Journal of Nuclear Materials (466 papers)Nuclear Fusion (227 papers)Fusion Engineering and Design (149 papers)Nature (144 papers)Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (120 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
4.0k papers receiving 79.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 18.1k
- Metals and Alloys 1.9k
- Radiation 6.1k
- Materials Chemistry 32.0k
- Aerospace Engineering 13.9k
Countries citing scholars working at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority at the time of their publication.
About United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority have published 4.4k papers, which have received a total of 84.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 949 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 442 papers in Radiation, 105 papers in Metals and Alloys, 1.7k papers in Materials Chemistry and 912 papers in Aerospace Engineering on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (843 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (761 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (752 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (550 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (370 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (289 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (237 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (224 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (18.1k citations), Metals and Alloys (1.9k citations), Radiation (6.1k citations), Materials Chemistry (32.0k citations) and Aerospace Engineering (13.9k citations). Authors at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Nature and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. Some of United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority's most productive authors include J. M. Hammersley, Simon Broadbent, John Bryan Taylor, John Henry Gittus, Bernard Thomas Kelly, Brian Tomkins, R. S. Pease, Thomas Stringer, R. W. Davidge and D.J. Mazey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.