United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

72.0k citations
4.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

3.6k papers receiving 68.5k citations

Peers

United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 14.5k
  • Radiation 5.3k
  • Metals and Alloys 1.6k
  • Materials Chemistry 26.3k
  • Aerospace Engineering 11.9k
Replace Research Complex at Harwell with:
Research Complex at Harwell United Kingdom
Bristol Robotics Laboratory United Kingdom
Cavendish Hospital United Kingdom
Atomic Weapons Establishment United Kingdom
Culham Centre for Fusion Energy United Kingdom
Culham Science Centre United Kingdom
Daresbury Laboratory United Kingdom
Direction des Energies France
National Physical Laboratory United Kingdom
CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Saclay France
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority relative to Research Complex at Harwell United Kingdom Research Complex at Harwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Research Complex at Harwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority at the time of their publication.

About United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority have published 4.0k papers, which have received a total of 72.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 820 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 408 papers in Radiation, 101 papers in Metals and Alloys, 1.5k papers in Materials Chemistry and 815 papers in Aerospace Engineering on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (719 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (690 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (649 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (485 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (336 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (265 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (210 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (187 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (14.5k citations), Radiation (5.3k citations), Metals and Alloys (1.6k citations), Materials Chemistry (26.3k citations) and Aerospace Engineering (11.9k citations). Authors at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Fusion, Nature, Fusion Engineering and Design and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. Some of United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority's most productive authors include J. M. Hammersley, Simon Broadbent, J. B. Taylor, B.T. Kelly, J.H. Gittus, Thomas Stringer, B. Tomkins, R. W. Davidge, D.J. Mazey and R.S. Nelson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact