National Physical Laboratory
Impact in
- Radiation top 0.5%
- Metals and Alloys top 1%
Papers in
-
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation 997
- Radiation 1.2k
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 421
- Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques 384
- Top scholars
- M. P. SeahAlan DinsdaleHenry CoxW. A. DenchA. TurnbullL.N. McCartneyXin‐She YangRichard J. C. Brown
- Journals
- Metrologia (504 papers)Nature (281 papers)IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (182 papers)Measurement Science and Technology (179 papers)Surface and Interface Analysis (163 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
National Physical Laboratory
12.7k papers receiving 343.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
- Radiation 20.1k
- Metals and Alloys 5.1k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 13.3k
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 12.8k
- Materials Chemistry 80.5k
Countries citing scholars working at National Physical Laboratory
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Physical Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Physical Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Physical Laboratory more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Physical Laboratory
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Physical Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Physical Laboratory at the time of their publication.
About National Physical Laboratory
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Physical Laboratory have published 13.6k papers, which have received a total of 353.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.1k papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 1.2k papers in Radiation, 2.2k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 452 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films and 157 papers in Metals and Alloys on the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (997 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (639 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (430 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (421 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (418 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (385 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (384 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (368 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiation (20.1k citations), Metals and Alloys (5.1k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (13.3k citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (12.8k citations) and Materials Chemistry (80.5k citations). Authors at National Physical Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, India and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Metrologia, Nature, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Measurement Science and Technology and Surface and Interface Analysis. Some of National Physical Laboratory's most productive authors include M. P. Seah, Alan Dinsdale, Henry Cox, W. A. Dench, A. Turnbull, L.N. McCartney, Xin‐She Yang, Richard J. C. Brown, P. Bradshaw and J. T. Stuart.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.