National Physical Laboratory

328.4k citations
13.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Physical Laboratory

12.2k papers receiving 319.5k citations

Peers

National Physical Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Radiation 19.0k
  • Metals and Alloys 4.6k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 12.2k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 11.8k
  • Materials Chemistry 75.6k
Replace Rutherford Appleton Laboratory with:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory United Kingdom
Research Complex at Harwell United Kingdom
Cavendish Hospital United Kingdom
Office National d'Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales France
Philips (Netherlands) Netherlands
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon France
Université Joseph Fourier France
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble France
ParisTech France
FZI Research Center for Information Technology Germany
National Physical Laboratory relative to Rutherford Appleton Laboratory United Kingdom Rutherford Appleton Laboratory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.2×
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Physical Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Physical Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Physical Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Physical Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Physical Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Physical Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Physical Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About National Physical Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Physical Laboratory have published 13.1k papers, which have received a total of 328.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 1.2k papers in Radiation, 2.2k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 433 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films and 3.2k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (960 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (626 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (417 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (410 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (382 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (381 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (381 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (361 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiation (19.0k citations), Metals and Alloys (4.6k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (12.2k citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (11.8k citations) and Materials Chemistry (75.6k citations). Authors at National Physical Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, India and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Metrologia, Nature, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Measurement Science and Technology and Physics in Medicine and Biology. Some of National Physical Laboratory's most productive authors include M. P. Seah, Alan Dinsdale, Henry Cox, W. A. Dench, Richard J. C. Brown, A. Turnbull, P. Bradshaw, L.N. McCartney, J. T. Stuart and P. Dean.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact