AWE Nuclear Security Technologies

62.8k citations
3.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

AWE Nuclear Security Technologies

2.8k papers receiving 61.2k citations

Peers

AWE Nuclear Security Technologies
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 19.5k
  • Radiation 7.2k
  • Geophysics 10.5k
  • Mechanics of Materials 13.9k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 12.8k
Replace United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority with:
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority United Kingdom
Research Complex at Harwell United Kingdom
Bristol Robotics Laboratory United Kingdom
CEA DAM Île-de-France France
Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée France
Cavendish Hospital United Kingdom
Campus France France
CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Saclay France
Culham Science Centre United Kingdom
École Nationale Supérieure d'Ingénieurs de Caen France
AWE Nuclear Security Technologies relative to United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority United Kingdom United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at AWE Nuclear Security Technologies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at AWE Nuclear Security Technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at AWE Nuclear Security Technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AWE Nuclear Security Technologies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at AWE Nuclear Security Technologies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with AWE Nuclear Security Technologies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with AWE Nuclear Security Technologies at the time of their publication.

About AWE Nuclear Security Technologies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with AWE Nuclear Security Technologies have published 3.0k papers, which have received a total of 62.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 469 papers in Radiation, 684 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 475 papers in Geophysics, 619 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 91 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology on the topics of Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (478 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (375 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (339 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (285 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (232 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (197 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (191 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (176 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (19.5k citations), Radiation (7.2k citations), Geophysics (10.5k citations), Mechanics of Materials (13.9k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (12.8k citations). Authors at AWE Nuclear Security Technologies collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry and Physical Review Letters. Some of AWE Nuclear Security Technologies's most productive authors include D. L. Youngs, Ian W. Donald, Roy Middleton, S. Hinds, H. N. V. Temperley, Brian L. Metcalfe, Robin J. R. Williams, Neil K. Bourne, Jeremy C. F. Millett and Michael Ellis Fisher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact