Culham Centre for Fusion Energy

95.1k citations
4.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Culham Centre for Fusion Energy

4.1k papers receiving 94.3k citations

Peers

Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 63.0k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 31.9k
  • Materials Chemistry 40.9k
  • Aerospace Engineering 18.9k
  • Radiation 5.0k
Replace Culham Science Centre with:
Culham Science Centre United Kingdom
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority United Kingdom
Direction des Energies France
Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules France
CEA DAM Île-de-France France
Cavendish Hospital United Kingdom
Atomic Weapons Establishment United Kingdom
Institut de Physique France
Research Complex at Harwell United Kingdom
European Space Research and Technology Centre Netherlands
Culham Centre for Fusion Energy relative to Culham Science Centre United Kingdom Culham Science Centre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Culham Science Centre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Culham Centre for Fusion Energy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Culham Centre for Fusion Energy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Culham Centre for Fusion Energy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Culham Centre for Fusion Energy more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Culham Centre for Fusion Energy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Culham Centre for Fusion Energy at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Culham Centre for Fusion Energy at the time of their publication.

About Culham Centre for Fusion Energy

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Culham Centre for Fusion Energy have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 95.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.9k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.2k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.1k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 369 papers in Radiation and 2.0k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (2.9k papers), Fusion materials and technologies (1.7k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.1k papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (772 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (582 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (525 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (500 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (488 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (63.0k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (31.9k citations), Materials Chemistry (40.9k citations), Aerospace Engineering (18.9k citations) and Radiation (5.0k citations). Authors at Culham Centre for Fusion Energy collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physics of Plasmas. Some of Culham Centre for Fusion Energy's most productive authors include S. L. Dudarev, J. W. Connor, R. J. Hastie, J. B. Taylor, H. R. Wilson, D. Nguyen-Manh, G.M. McCracken, R. O. Dendy, G.F. Matthews and Mark R. Gilbert.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact