Thomas Stringer

1.7k citations
54 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Stringer

51 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Stringer
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 878
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 697
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 279
  • Aerospace Engineering 187
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 23
Replace Ken‐Ichi Nishikawa with:
Ken‐Ichi Nishikawa United States
J. Rekstad Norway
K. O’Brien United Kingdom
S. Soldatov Germany
Tsutomu Takahashi Japan
W.A. Bongers Netherlands
К. Таnака Japan
Carlo Rubbia Switzerland
K. Czerski Poland
Thomas Stringer relative to Ken‐Ichi Nishikawa United States Ken‐Ichi Nishikawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ken‐Ichi Nishikawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Stringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Stringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Stringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Stringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Stringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Stringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Stringer. The network helps show where Thomas Stringer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Stringer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Stringer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Stringer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978187
2 1964162
3 1969138
4 1972112
5 1963103
6 199374
7 197473
8 197042
9 202438
10 199333
11 197131
12 197030
13 199230
14 202225
15 197520
16 202418
17 202218
18 199417
19 202316
20 197316

About Thomas Stringer

Thomas Stringer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Pollution, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (27 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (18 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (7 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (878 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (697 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (279 citations), Aerospace Engineering (187 citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (23 citations). Thomas Stringer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. W. Connor, F Tibone, H. R. Wilson, Manuel Burelo, G. Schmidt, Cecilia D. Treviño‐Quintanilla, G. Maddison, G. Corrigan, J W Connor and Josué David Hernández‐Varela. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Journal of Plasma Physics, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Environmental Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact