Research Complex at Harwell

216.0k citations
6.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Research Complex at Harwell

6.1k papers receiving 210.4k citations

Peers

Research Complex at Harwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Structural Biology 2.6k
  • Radiation 14.9k
  • Materials Chemistry 71.8k
  • Catalysis 9.5k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 14.1k
Replace Diamond Light Source with:
Diamond Light Source United Kingdom
National Physical Laboratory United Kingdom
Daresbury Laboratory United Kingdom
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory United Kingdom
Synchrotron soleil France
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres France
École Polytechnique France
Laboratoire de physique des Solides France
CEA Paris-Saclay France
Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics Netherlands
Research Complex at Harwell relative to Diamond Light Source United Kingdom Diamond Light Source's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Diamond Light Source · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Research Complex at Harwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research Complex at Harwell. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research Complex at Harwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Complex at Harwell more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Research Complex at Harwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research Complex at Harwell at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research Complex at Harwell at the time of their publication.

About Research Complex at Harwell

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research Complex at Harwell have published 6.5k papers, which have received a total of 216.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 785 papers in Radiation, 99 papers in Structural Biology, 2.0k papers in Materials Chemistry, 299 papers in Catalysis and 476 papers in Inorganic Chemistry on the topics of Nuclear Physics and Applications (528 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (336 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (331 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (233 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (216 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (209 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (206 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (197 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Structural Biology (2.6k citations), Radiation (14.9k citations), Materials Chemistry (71.8k citations), Catalysis (9.5k citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (14.1k citations). Authors at Research Complex at Harwell collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nature, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Nature Communications and Scientific Reports. Some of Research Complex at Harwell's most productive authors include John P. Hubbard, M. J. D. Powell, R. Fletcher, P. Tasker, T. H. R. Skyrme, J. E. Sinclair, Michael W. Finnis, Mary F. Lyon, A. M. Stoneham and M. J. Gillan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact