Universidade Federal de Pelotas

390.1k citations
25.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Dental materials and restorations 505
    • Agricultural and Food Sciences 564

Universidade Federal de Pelotas

20.6k papers receiving 324.1k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Orthodontics 17.2k
  • General Dentistry 3.7k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 34.9k
  • Periodontics 8.8k
  • Oral Surgery 12.9k
Replace Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina with:
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brazil
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brazil
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Brazil
Universidade Federal do Paraná Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Maringá Brazil
Universidade Luterana do Brasil Brazil
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal de Pelotas relative to Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brazil Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal de Pelotas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal de Pelotas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal de Pelotas more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pelotas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pelotas at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal de Pelotas

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pelotas have published 25.3k papers, which have received a total of 390.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 635 papers in Orthodontics, 635 papers in Forestry, 197 papers in General Dentistry, 1.2k papers in Soil Science and 4.4k papers in Plant Science on the topics of Growth and nutrition in plants (1.2k papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (884 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (770 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (564 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (539 papers), Dental materials and restorations (505 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (493 papers) and Youth, Drugs, and Violence (458 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthodontics (17.2k citations), General Dentistry (3.7k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (34.9k citations), Periodontics (8.8k citations) and Oral Surgery (12.9k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal de Pelotas collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Revista de Saúde Pública, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira and PLoS ONE. Some of Universidade Federal de Pelotas's most productive authors include César G. Victora, Aluísio J. D. Barros, Fernando C. Barros, Pedro Curi Hallal, Bernardo Lessa Horta, Flávio Fernando Demarco, Iná S. Santos, Elessandra da Rosa Zavareze, Álvaro Renato Guerra Dias and Vânia Naomi Hirakata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact