Universidade Estadual de Londrina

19.1k papers receiving 268.5k citations

Peers

Universidade Estadual de Londrina
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Biological Psychiatry 3.8k
  • Plant Science 53.3k
  • Parasitology 8.5k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 9.5k
  • Food Science 21.2k
Replace Universidade Federal do Paraná with:
Universidade Federal do Paraná Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brazil
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Maringá Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Brazil
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brazil
Universidade Federal de Goiás Brazil
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
Universidade Federal de Pelotas Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Londrina relative to Universidade Federal do Paraná Brazil Universidade Federal do Paraná's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Universidade Federal do Paraná · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Estadual de Londrina. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Estadual de Londrina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Estadual de Londrina more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Estadual de Londrina at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Estadual de Londrina at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Estadual de Londrina

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Estadual de Londrina have published 23.0k papers, which have received a total of 294.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 474 papers in Forestry, 3.5k papers in Plant Science, 594 papers in Parasitology, 658 papers in Information Systems and Management and 887 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Education Pedagogy and Practices (904 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (802 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (734 papers), Business and Management Studies (643 papers), Sports Performance and Training (573 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (562 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (549 papers) and Science and Education Research (502 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (3.8k citations), Plant Science (53.3k citations), Parasitology (8.5k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (9.5k citations) and Food Science (21.2k citations). Authors at Universidade Estadual de Londrina collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, PLoS ONE, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Semina Ciências Agrárias and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. Some of Universidade Estadual de Londrina's most productive authors include Fábio Yamashita, Cláudia Bueno dos Reis Martinez, Maria Victória Eiras Grossmann, Waldiceu A. Verri, Mariangela Hungría, Suzana Mali, Natália Maria Ventura da Silva Alfaya, César Ricardo Teixeira Tarley, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura and Amauri Alcindo Alfieri.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact