Universidade Federal Fluminense

500.0k citations
41.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidade Federal Fluminense

33.5k papers receiving 459.6k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal Fluminense
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Orthodontics 8.3k
  • Oral Surgery 13.0k
  • Parasitology 9.7k
  • Pollution 17.7k
  • Metals and Alloys 3.9k
Replace Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro with:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Brazil
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Brazil
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade Federal do Paraná Brazil
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Brazil
Universidade Federal Fluminense relative to Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal Fluminense

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal Fluminense. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal Fluminense with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal Fluminense more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal Fluminense

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal Fluminense at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal Fluminense at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal Fluminense

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal Fluminense have published 41.1k papers, which have received a total of 500.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in Urban Studies, 1.0k papers in Information Systems and Management, 145 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 744 papers in Oral Surgery and 447 papers in Orthodontics on the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (1.2k papers), Business and Management Studies (835 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (760 papers), Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic (596 papers), Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (594 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (579 papers), Urban Development and Societal Issues (578 papers) and Youth, Drugs, and Violence (512 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthodontics (8.3k citations), Oral Surgery (13.0k citations), Parasitology (9.7k citations), Pollution (17.7k citations) and Metals and Alloys (3.9k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal Fluminense collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, PLoS ONE, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Some of Universidade Federal Fluminense's most productive authors include Luiz Drude de Lacerda, Ricardo Erthal Santelli, Carlos Adam Conte‐Júnior, Vı́tor F. Ferreira, José Mauro Granjeiro, J.M.L. Reis, Paulo Rangel Rios, Denise Mafra, Adriano G. Cruz and M. A. Contínentino.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact