Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

50.9k papers receiving 803.2k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Biological Psychiatry 7.7k
  • Biochemistry 18.6k
  • Orthodontics 11.0k
  • Aquatic Science 19.4k
  • Food Science 48.2k
Replace Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul with:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brazil
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade Federal do Paraná Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Brazil
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
Universidade de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina relative to Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina have published 61.2k papers, which have received a total of 868.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.7k papers in Information Systems and Management, 676 papers in Forestry, 629 papers in Occupational Therapy, 3.7k papers in General Health Professions and 1.1k papers in Aquatic Science on the topics of Business and Management Studies (2.5k papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (2.0k papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (1.3k papers), Education and Digital Technologies (1.2k papers), Education and Public Policy (916 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (795 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (772 papers) and Science and Education Research (758 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (7.7k citations), Biochemistry (18.6k citations), Orthodontics (11.0k citations), Aquatic Science (19.4k citations) and Food Science (48.2k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Cadernos de Saúde Pública, PLoS ONE, Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem and Revista de Saúde Pública. Some of Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina's most productive authors include João Β. Calixto, Ivo Barbi, Adair R.S. Santos, Dachamir Hotza, Enedir Ghisi, Ana Lúcia S. Rodrigues, Guilherme Luz Tortorella, Sandra Regina Salvador Ferreira, Reinaldo Ν. Takahashi and Roberto Lamberts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact