Tulsa Community College

260 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Tulsa Community College
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Biological Psychiatry 564
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 296
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Research and Theory 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 891
Replace Mental Health Mental Retardation of Tarrant County with:
Mental Health Mental Retardation of Tarrant County United States
Texas Health and Science University United States
Center for Occupational Research and Development United States
Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center United States
Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation United States
Anderson University - Indiana United States
Dallas Independent School District United States
Colorado Department of Education United States
Holistic Management International United States
Juvenile Protective Association United States
Tulsa Community College relative to Mental Health Mental Retardation of Tarrant County United States Mental Health Mental Retardation of Tarrant County's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Mental Health Mental Retardation of Tarrant County · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Tulsa Community College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tulsa Community College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tulsa Community College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tulsa Community College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Tulsa Community College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tulsa Community College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tulsa Community College at the time of their publication.

About Tulsa Community College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tulsa Community College have published 352 papers, which have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 26 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 5 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 37 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience and 32 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (28 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (26 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (23 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (16 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (10 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers) and Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (564 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (296 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Research and Theory (57 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (891 citations). Authors at Tulsa Community College collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Brain Behavior and Immunity, Neuropsychopharmacology, Molecular Psychiatry, Translational Psychiatry and Academic Medicine. Some of Tulsa Community College's most productive authors include Sahib S. Khalsa, Chan M. Hellman, Woo Sik Jung, W. Kyle Simmons, Yuri Milaneschi, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, Elisabeth F. C. van Rossum, Jonathan Savitz, Rachel C. Lapidus and Gary G. Berntson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact