Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
Impact in
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Internal Medicine top 10%
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 23
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 10
- Oncology 59
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 34
- Top scholars
- Lauren B. AdamsonHeidelise AlsEdward Z. TronickT. Berry BrazeltonJohn M. JakicicJamy D. ArdCathy NonasCatherine M. Loria
- Journals
- Circulation (30 papers)Stroke (12 papers)Cancer Research (11 papers)Radiology (8 papers)The Breast Journal (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
244 papers receiving 16.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 4.4k
- Internal Medicine 551
- Cancer Research 2.3k
- Pharmacy 647
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation at the time of their publication.
About Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation have published 320 papers, which have received a total of 20.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 40 papers in Cancer Research, 59 papers in Oncology, 26 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 32 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 18 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine on the topics of Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (34 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (23 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (16 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (14 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (10 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers) and AI in cancer detection (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (4.4k citations), Internal Medicine (551 citations), Cancer Research (2.3k citations), Pharmacy (647 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.8k citations). Authors at Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Circulation, Stroke, Cancer Research, Radiology and The Breast Journal. Some of Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation's most productive authors include Lauren B. Adamson, Heidelise Als, Edward Z. Tronick, T. Berry Brazelton, John M. Jakicic, Jamy D. Ard, Cathy Nonas, Catherine M. Loria, Van S. Hubbard and Barbara E. Millen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.