Royal College of Nursing

20.4k citations
1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Royal College of Nursing

956 papers receiving 20.4k citations

Peers

Royal College of Nursing
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Research and Theory 1.8k
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 1k
  • General Health Professions 7.5k
  • Leadership and Management 411
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 247
Replace Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust with:
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust United Kingdom
King's Fund United Kingdom
Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) Belgium
Health Service Executive Ireland
NHS England
Bradford Institute for Health Research United Kingdom
East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust United Kingdom
Royal College of Physicians United Kingdom
Spaarne Gasthuis Netherlands
NHS Education for Scotland United Kingdom
Royal College of Nursing relative to Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust United Kingdom Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal College of Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal College of Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal College of Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal College of Nursing more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal College of Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal College of Nursing at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal College of Nursing at the time of their publication.

About Royal College of Nursing

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal College of Nursing have published 1k papers, which have received a total of 20.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 145 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 203 papers in Research and Theory, 421 papers in General Health Professions, 26 papers in Leadership and Management and 59 papers in Health Information Management on the topics of Nursing education and management (203 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (137 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (134 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (66 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (54 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (44 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (40 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (1.8k citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (1k citations), General Health Professions (7.5k citations), Leadership and Management (411 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (247 citations). Authors at Royal College of Nursing collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Canada and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nursing Standard, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Journal of research in nursing. Some of Royal College of Nursing's most productive authors include Alison A. Kitson, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Brendan George McCormack, Gill Harvey, Jan Dewing, Kate Seers, Kim Manley, Jan Draper, Angie Titchen and Kirstie L. Haywood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact