Royal College of Nursing

898 papers receiving 23.6k citations

Peers

Royal College of Nursing
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Research and Theory 882
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 1.2k
  • General Health Professions 10.6k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 923
  • Health Information Management 781
Replace Centre for Nursing Innovation with:
Centre for Nursing Innovation United Kingdom
Florence Nightingale Foundation United Kingdom
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Department of Health and Social Care United Kingdom
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
HAN University of Applied Sciences Netherlands
Institute of Medical Ethics United Kingdom
Nuffield Health United Kingdom
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence United Kingdom
Whittington Hospital United Kingdom
Royal College of Nursing relative to Centre for Nursing Innovation United Kingdom Centre for Nursing Innovation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Centre for Nursing Innovation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal College of Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal College of Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal College of Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal College of Nursing more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal College of Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal College of Nursing at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal College of Nursing at the time of their publication.

About Royal College of Nursing

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal College of Nursing have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 35.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 42 papers in Research and Theory, 54 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 407 papers in General Health Professions, 55 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 39 papers in Health Information Management on the topics of Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (61 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (58 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (53 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (48 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (48 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (42 papers), Nursing education and management (42 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (882 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (10.6k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (923 citations) and Health Information Management (781 citations). Authors at Royal College of Nursing collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Nursing Standard and Nursing Research. Some of Royal College of Nursing's most productive authors include Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Alison Kitson, Brendan McCormack, Gill Harvey, Kate Seers, Merle H. Mishel, Sophie Staniszewska, Jan Dewing, Kim Manley and Jan Draper.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact