Centre for Nursing Innovation
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 0.2%
- Nursing education and management
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Nursing education and management 74
-
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation 64
- Top scholars
- Jann Murray-GarcíaMelanie TervalonJudith HaberGeri LoBiondo‐WoodSean P. ClarkeLinda H. AikenDouglas M. SloanePolly Ryan
- Journals
- JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (103 papers)Advances in Nursing Science (71 papers)Nurse Educator (63 papers)Nursing Research (45 papers)The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (44 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Centre for Nursing Innovation
1.4k papers receiving 33.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Research and Theory 2.2k
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 1.2k
- General Health Professions 10.5k
- Emergency Medical Services 2.3k
- Leadership and Management 346
Countries citing scholars working at Centre for Nursing Innovation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre for Nursing Innovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre for Nursing Innovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre for Nursing Innovation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre for Nursing Innovation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre for Nursing Innovation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre for Nursing Innovation at the time of their publication.
About Centre for Nursing Innovation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre for Nursing Innovation have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 44.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 74 papers in Research and Theory, 100 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 466 papers in General Health Professions, 88 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 12 papers in Leadership and Management on the topics of Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (75 papers), Nursing education and management (74 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (71 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (67 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (64 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (62 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (53 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (48 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (2.2k citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (10.5k citations), Emergency Medical Services (2.3k citations) and Leadership and Management (346 citations). Authors at Centre for Nursing Innovation collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Advances in Nursing Science, Nurse Educator, Nursing Research and The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. Some of Centre for Nursing Innovation's most productive authors include Jann Murray-García, Melanie Tervalon, Judith Haber, Geri LoBiondo‐Wood, Sean P. Clarke, Linda H. Aiken, Douglas M. Sloane, Polly Ryan, Jaclene A. Zauszniewski and Mary K. Canales.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.