Florence Nightingale Foundation
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Nursing education and management
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Papers in
-
- Nursing education and management 30
- Top scholars
- Alison WhileIan NormanPeter GriffithsNiall McCraeEmma ReamAnnmarie GrealishChristine NortonAnne Marie Rafferty
- Journals
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (57 papers)International Journal of Nursing Studies (37 papers)Journal of Clinical Nursing (27 papers)Midwifery (25 papers)BMJ Open (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Florence Nightingale Foundation
764 papers receiving 19.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
- Research and Theory 1.1k
- General Health Professions 6.4k
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 301
- Leadership and Management 212
- Emergency Medical Services 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Florence Nightingale Foundation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Florence Nightingale Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Florence Nightingale Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florence Nightingale Foundation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Florence Nightingale Foundation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Florence Nightingale Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Florence Nightingale Foundation at the time of their publication.
About Florence Nightingale Foundation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Florence Nightingale Foundation have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 32.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 30 papers in Research and Theory, 17 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 199 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and 41 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (40 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (40 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (31 papers), Nursing education and management (30 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (29 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (28 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (27 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (1.1k citations), General Health Professions (6.4k citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (301 citations), Leadership and Management (212 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (1.1k citations). Authors at Florence Nightingale Foundation collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Midwifery and BMJ Open. Some of Florence Nightingale Foundation's most productive authors include Alison While, Ian Norman, Peter Griffiths, Niall McCrae, Emma Ream, Annmarie Grealish, Christine Norton, Anne Marie Rafferty, K. Louise Barriball and Trevor Murrells.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.