Nursing Standard

13.0k papers and 65.1k indexed citations

About

The 13.0k papers published in Nursing Standard in the last decades have received a total of 65.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nursing Standard usually cover General Health Professions (2.3k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (929 papers) and Surgery (623 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Systems and Challenges (505 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (364 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (346 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nursing Standard are Roger G. Evans, Lorraine Hicking-Woodison, Simon Wright, Jaquelina Hewitt‐Taylor, Ruth Bell, Michael Marmot, Bob Price, Dinah Gould, Georgina Casey and Vanora Hundley.

In The Last Decade

Nursing Standard

6.3k papers receiving 41.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Nursing Standard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nursing Standard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nursing Standard.

Countries where authors publish in Nursing Standard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nursing Standard. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nursing Standard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing Standard more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026