Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 61
- Top scholars
- Jos KleijnenDavid MoherMike J ClarkeDouglas G. AltmanJohn P. A. IoannidisCynthia D. MulrowPhilip James DevereauxPeter Christian Gøtzsche
- Journals
- Nature Reviews Nephrology (133 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (60 papers)Health Technology Assessment (57 papers)PharmacoEconomics (42 papers)Medicine (37 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
769 papers receiving 84.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 3.8k
- Internal Medicine 1.2k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.7k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.2k
- Health Informatics 462
Countries citing scholars working at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication.
About Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 108.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 63 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 8 papers in Family Practice, 29 papers in Nephrology, 1 paper in Medical Terminology and 81 papers in Oncology on the topics of Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (61 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (47 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (21 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (19 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (17 papers), Renal and related cancers (16 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (14 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (3.8k citations), Internal Medicine (1.2k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.7k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.2k citations) and Health Informatics (462 citations). Authors at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Reviews Nephrology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment, PharmacoEconomics and Medicine. Some of Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)'s most productive authors include Jos Kleijnen, David Moher, Mike J Clarke, Douglas G. Altman, John P. A. Ioannidis, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Philip James Devereaux, Peter Christian Gøtzsche, Jennifer Tetzlaff and Alessandro Liberati.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.