Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Informatics top 5%
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 64
-
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management 22
- Top scholars
- Jos KleijnenDavid MoherMike ClarkeDouglas G. AltmanJohn P. A. IoannidisPeter C GøtzscheP.J. DevereauxAlessandro Liberati
- Journals
- Medicine (323 papers)Nature Reviews Nephrology (133 papers)Epidemiology (126 papers)Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (89 papers)Annals of Plastic Surgery (76 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
2.0k papers receiving 93.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 3.3k
- Health Informatics 529
- Psychiatry and Mental health 5.1k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.5k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication.
About Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 120.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 71 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 31 papers in Occupational Therapy, 290 papers in Surgery, 154 papers in General Health Professions and 32 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine on the topics of Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (64 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (43 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (42 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (34 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (27 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (24 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (23 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (3.3k citations), Health Informatics (529 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (5.1k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (1.5k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.4k citations). Authors at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Medicine, Nature Reviews Nephrology, Epidemiology, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics and Annals of Plastic Surgery. Some of Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)'s most productive authors include Jos Kleijnen, David Moher, Mike Clarke, Douglas G. Altman, John P. A. Ioannidis, Peter C Gøtzsche, P.J. Devereaux, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff and Cynthia D. Mulrow.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.