Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

600.2k citations
21.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

20.6k papers receiving 592.8k citations

Peers

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 87.3k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 67.7k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 82.8k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 63.9k
  • Materials Chemistry 164.1k
Replace CEA Paris-Saclay with:
CEA Paris-Saclay France
École Polytechnique France
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives France
Forschungszentrum Jülich Germany
Cavendish Hospital United Kingdom
Daresbury Laboratory United Kingdom
Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics Netherlands
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres France
Université Joseph Fourier France
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Germany
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory relative to CEA Paris-Saclay France CEA Paris-Saclay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
CEA Paris-Saclay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rutherford Appleton Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Rutherford Appleton Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Rutherford Appleton Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Rutherford Appleton Laboratory have published 21.6k papers, which have received a total of 600.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.6k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2.8k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 2.0k papers in Radiation, 2.8k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 2.5k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics on the topics of Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (1.7k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (1.3k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.3k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (1.3k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1.1k papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (1.1k papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1.1k papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (87.3k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (67.7k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (82.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (63.9k citations) and Materials Chemistry (164.1k citations). Authors at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Physica B Condensed Matter, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Physical review. B.. Some of Rutherford Appleton Laboratory's most productive authors include Alan K. Soper, David A. Keen, Pavel Matousek, Keith Refson, William I. F. David, M. Lockwood, Kevin S. Knight, Stewart J. Clark, J. Penfold and Robert K. Thomas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact