London Centre for Nanotechnology
Impact in
- Condensed Matter Physics top 2%
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Quantum and electron transport phenomena
Papers in
-
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics 237
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 122
-
- Quantum and electron transport phenomena 205
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 177
- Surface and Thin Film Phenomena 109
- Magnetic properties of thin films 96
- Top scholars
- Angelos MichaelidesJiří KlimešDavid R. BowlerDario AlfèGuillaume CharrasQuentin A. PankhurstJon DobsonJoan Connolly
- Journals
- Physical Review B (189 papers)Physical review. B. (152 papers)Physical Review Letters (139 papers)The Journal of Chemical Physics (110 papers)Nature Communications (108 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
London Centre for Nanotechnology
3.4k papers receiving 161k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- Condensed Matter Physics 13.3k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 33.2k
- Materials Chemistry 36.3k
- Cell Biology 9.1k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 10.3k
Countries citing scholars working at London Centre for Nanotechnology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at London Centre for Nanotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at London Centre for Nanotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites London Centre for Nanotechnology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at London Centre for Nanotechnology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with London Centre for Nanotechnology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with London Centre for Nanotechnology at the time of their publication.
About London Centre for Nanotechnology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with London Centre for Nanotechnology have published 3.5k papers, which have received a total of 161.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 378 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 912 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 39 papers in Structural Biology, 136 papers in Radiation and 657 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (237 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (205 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (177 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (122 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (112 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (109 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (107 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (96 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (13.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (33.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (36.3k citations), Cell Biology (9.1k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (10.3k citations). Authors at London Centre for Nanotechnology collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review B, Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Nature Communications. Some of London Centre for Nanotechnology's most productive authors include Angelos Michaelides, Jiří Klimeš, David R. Bowler, Dario Alfè, Guillaume Charras, Quentin A. Pankhurst, Jon Dobson, Joan Connolly, Stephen K Jones and Ian Robinson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.