London Centre for Nanotechnology
Impact in
- Structural Biology top 2%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 2%
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Papers in
-
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 274
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics 258
- Top scholars
- Angelos MichaelidesAlexander M. SeifalianJiří KlimešDavid R. BowlerGuillaume CharrasDario AlfèQuentin A. PankhurstJon Dobson
- Journals
- Physical Review B (189 papers)Physical review. B. (146 papers)Physical Review Letters (137 papers)Applied Physics Letters (99 papers)Nature Communications (98 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
London Centre for Nanotechnology
4.0k papers receiving 172.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
- Structural Biology 2.5k
- Condensed Matter Physics 15.5k
- Materials Chemistry 56.7k
- Biomaterials 13.7k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 32.6k
Countries citing scholars working at London Centre for Nanotechnology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at London Centre for Nanotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at London Centre for Nanotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites London Centre for Nanotechnology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at London Centre for Nanotechnology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with London Centre for Nanotechnology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with London Centre for Nanotechnology at the time of their publication.
About London Centre for Nanotechnology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with London Centre for Nanotechnology have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 177.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 107 papers in Structural Biology, 533 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 1.0k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1.2k papers in Materials Chemistry and 481 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Quantum and electron transport phenomena (278 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (274 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (258 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (220 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (186 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (184 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (154 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (152 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Structural Biology (2.5k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (15.5k citations), Materials Chemistry (56.7k citations), Biomaterials (13.7k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (32.6k citations). Authors at London Centre for Nanotechnology collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review B, Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Nature Communications. Some of London Centre for Nanotechnology's most productive authors include Angelos Michaelides, Alexander M. Seifalian, Jiří Klimeš, David R. Bowler, Guillaume Charras, Dario Alfè, Quentin A. Pankhurst, Jon Dobson, Stephen Jones and Joan Connolly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.