Diamond Light Source

197.0k citations
6.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications 302
    • Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques 589
    • X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis 306

Diamond Light Source

6.1k papers receiving 193.6k citations

Peers

Diamond Light Source
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
  • Structural Biology 4.5k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 24.3k
  • Materials Chemistry 80.3k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 28.5k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 17.7k
Replace Daresbury Laboratory with:
Daresbury Laboratory United Kingdom
Research Complex at Harwell United Kingdom
London Centre for Nanotechnology United Kingdom
Synchrotron soleil France
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory United Kingdom
National Physical Laboratory United Kingdom
Institut de minéralogie, de physique des matériaux et de cosmochimie France
Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics Netherlands
Laboratoire de physique des Solides France
Laboratoire de Chimie Physique France
Diamond Light Source relative to Daresbury Laboratory United Kingdom Daresbury Laboratory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Daresbury Laboratory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Diamond Light Source

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Diamond Light Source. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Diamond Light Source with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diamond Light Source more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Diamond Light Source

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Diamond Light Source at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Diamond Light Source at the time of their publication.

About Diamond Light Source

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Diamond Light Source have published 6.5k papers, which have received a total of 197.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 302 papers in Structural Biology, 849 papers in Radiation, 840 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 2.6k papers in Materials Chemistry and 1.0k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (589 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (452 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (345 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (323 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (312 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (306 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (304 papers) and Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (302 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Structural Biology (4.5k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (24.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (80.3k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (28.5k citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (17.7k citations). Authors at Diamond Light Source collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. B., Nature Communications, Physical Review B, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation and Scientific Reports. Some of Diamond Light Source's most productive authors include David O. Scanlon, Graeme Winter, G. van der Laan, Chiu C. Tang, Alex M. Ganose, Ian W. Hamley, Giannantonio Cibin, Aron Walsh, David I. Stuart and J. Frederick W. Mosselmans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact