American Board of Internal Medicine
Impact in
- Family Practice top 1%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Medical Education and Admissions
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 84
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 241
- Top scholars
- Eric S. HolmboeChristine K. CasselJohn J. NorciniRebecca S. LipnerCarol CarraccioWilliam IobstThomas W. BiesterRobert L. Phillips
- Journals
- Academic Medicine (83 papers)The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (54 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (43 papers)Annals of Surgery (31 papers)Annals of Internal Medicine (30 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
American Board of Internal Medicine
791 papers receiving 20.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
- Family Practice 3.0k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 10.0k
- General Health Professions 5.3k
- Gender Studies 1.7k
- Emergency Medical Services 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at American Board of Internal Medicine
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Board of Internal Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Board of Internal Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Board of Internal Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at American Board of Internal Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Board of Internal Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Board of Internal Medicine at the time of their publication.
About American Board of Internal Medicine
In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Board of Internal Medicine have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 29.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 84 papers in Family Practice, 301 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 236 papers in General Health Professions, 40 papers in Health Information Management and 32 papers in Pharmacy on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (241 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (101 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (84 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (81 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (70 papers), Radiology practices and education (63 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (59 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Family Practice (3.0k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (10.0k citations), General Health Professions (5.3k citations), Gender Studies (1.7k citations) and Emergency Medical Services (1.1k citations). Authors at American Board of Internal Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Academic Medicine, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, The American Journal of Surgery, Annals of Surgery and Annals of Internal Medicine. Some of American Board of Internal Medicine's most productive authors include Eric S. Holmboe, Christine K. Cassel, John J. Norcini, Rebecca S. Lipner, Carol Carraccio, William Iobst, Thomas W. Biester, Robert L. Phillips, Olle ten Cate and Jason R. Frank.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.