American Board of Internal Medicine

22.9k citations
521 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

American Board of Internal Medicine

505 papers receiving 22.9k citations

Peers

American Board of Internal Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 12.6k
  • Family Practice 493
  • General Health Professions 3.8k
  • Health Information Management 855
  • Health 632
Replace American College of Cardiology with:
American College of Cardiology United States
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Canada
National Board of Medical Examiners United States
Commonwealth Fund United States
Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas United States
Ariadne Labs United States
VNS Health United States
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative United States
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists United States
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center United States
American Board of Internal Medicine relative to American College of Cardiology United States American College of Cardiology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
American College of Cardiology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Board of Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Board of Internal Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Board of Internal Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Board of Internal Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Board of Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Board of Internal Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Board of Internal Medicine at the time of their publication.

About American Board of Internal Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Board of Internal Medicine have published 521 papers, which have received a total of 22.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 22 papers in Family Practice, 299 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 110 papers in General Health Professions, 25 papers in Health Information Management and 32 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (277 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (47 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (35 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (32 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (20 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (19 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (18 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (12.6k citations), Family Practice (493 citations), General Health Professions (3.8k citations), Health Information Management (855 citations) and Health (632 citations). Authors at American Board of Internal Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Academic Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, JAMA and Medical Teacher. Some of American Board of Internal Medicine's most productive authors include Eric S. Holmboe, John J. Norcini, Rebecca S. Lipner, F. Daniel Duffy, Cara S. Lesser, William F. Iobst, Ronald M. Epstein, Linda L. Blank, Christine K. Cassel and Olle ten Cate.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact