Public Policy Institute of California
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Healthcare Policy and Management
- General Health Professions top 5%
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Policy and Management 138
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 67
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 66
- Gender Studies 148
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 96
- Top scholars
- Henry HansmannJames T. HamiltonHelen F. LaddSuzanne ScotchmerPaul W. NewacheckPhilip J. CookHarry J. HolzerMagnus Lofstrom
- Journals
- Health Affairs (51 papers)American Journal of Public Health (27 papers)Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (24 papers)Economics of Education Review (19 papers)Medical Care (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Public Policy Institute of California
2.0k papers receiving 73.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
- Economics and Econometrics 16.5k
- General Health Professions 11.6k
- Public Administration 1.7k
- Health 3.5k
- Gender Studies 3.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Public Policy Institute of California
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Public Policy Institute of California. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Public Policy Institute of California with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Policy Institute of California more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Public Policy Institute of California
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Public Policy Institute of California at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Public Policy Institute of California at the time of their publication.
About Public Policy Institute of California
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Public Policy Institute of California have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 87.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 583 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 148 papers in Gender Studies, 343 papers in General Health Professions, 49 papers in Public Administration and 558 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (138 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (96 papers), School Choice and Performance (93 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (74 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (74 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (67 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (67 papers) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (66 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (16.5k citations), General Health Professions (11.6k citations), Public Administration (1.7k citations), Health (3.5k citations) and Gender Studies (3.8k citations). Authors at Public Policy Institute of California collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Health Affairs, American Journal of Public Health, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Economics of Education Review and Medical Care. Some of Public Policy Institute of California's most productive authors include Henry Hansmann, James T. Hamilton, Helen F. Ladd, Suzanne Scotchmer, Paul W. Newacheck, Philip J. Cook, Harry J. Holzer, Magnus Lofstrom, Jean M. Mitchell and Donald H. Taylor.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.