Decision Research
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 0.2%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 285
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 102
- Top scholars
- Paul SlovicBaruch FischhoffEllen PetersSarah LichtensteinAnthony LeiserowitzMelissa L. FinucaneDonald G. MacGregorRobin M. Hogarth
- Journals
- Risk Analysis (89 papers)Judgment and Decision Making (33 papers)Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (31 papers)Journal of Risk Research (24 papers)Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Decision Research
1.2k papers receiving 100.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
- General Decision Sciences 18.0k
- Applied Psychology 9.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 43.4k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 8.7k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 4.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Decision Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Decision Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Decision Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decision Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Decision Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Decision Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Decision Research at the time of their publication.
About Decision Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Decision Research have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 109.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 285 papers in General Decision Sciences, 127 papers in Applied Psychology, 16 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 87 papers in Safety Research and 72 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty on the topics of Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (285 papers), Risk Perception and Management (238 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (119 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (102 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (93 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (85 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (73 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (72 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (18.0k citations), Applied Psychology (9.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (43.4k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (8.7k citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (4.8k citations). Authors at Decision Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden and have published in prestigious journals including Risk Analysis, Judgment and Decision Making, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Journal of Risk Research and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Some of Decision Research's most productive authors include Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff, Ellen Peters, Sarah Lichtenstein, Anthony Leiserowitz, Melissa L. Finucane, Donald G. MacGregor, Robin M. Hogarth, Stephen J. Hoch and C. K. Mertz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.