John F. Kennedy University

212.4k citations
3.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

John F. Kennedy University

3.0k papers receiving 193.6k citations

Peers

John F. Kennedy University
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Economics and Econometrics 64.7k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19.3k
  • Finance 18.1k
  • Accounting 18.5k
  • General Decision Sciences 2.2k
Replace Hoover Institution with:
Hoover Institution United States
Portland State University United States
Public Policy Institute of California United States
University of San Diego United States
Loyola Marymount University United States
Walker (United States) United States
Chapman University United States
Quantitative BioSciences United States
Pepperdine University United States
California State University, East Bay United States
John F. Kennedy University relative to Hoover Institution United States Hoover Institution's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Hoover Institution · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at John F. Kennedy University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at John F. Kennedy University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at John F. Kennedy University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Kennedy University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at John F. Kennedy University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with John F. Kennedy University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with John F. Kennedy University at the time of their publication.

About John F. Kennedy University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with John F. Kennedy University have published 3.5k papers, which have received a total of 212.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 926 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 60 papers in General Decision Sciences, 202 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 187 papers in Finance and 433 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of Climate Change Policy and Economics (161 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (126 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (121 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (92 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (91 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (82 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (80 papers) and Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (80 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (64.7k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (19.3k citations), Finance (18.1k citations), Accounting (18.5k citations) and General Decision Sciences (2.2k citations). Authors at John F. Kennedy University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including American Economic Review, New England Journal of Medicine, Science, The Journal of Economic Perspectives and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of John F. Kennedy University's most productive authors include Dani Rodrik, Alberto Abadie, Sheila Jasanoff, Robert N. Stavins, Jeffrey A. Frankel, James H. Stock, Richard Zeckhauser, Ricardo Hausmann, Mark W. Watson and Pippa Norris.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact