Peabody

25.5k citations
526 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Peabody

459 papers receiving 24.3k citations

Peers

Peabody
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 10.0k
  • Sensory Systems 3.3k
  • Safety Research 3.4k
  • Statistics and Probability 2.7k
  • Education 9.5k
Replace Psykiatrien i Region Syddanmark with:
Psykiatrien i Region Syddanmark Denmark
Laboratoire de Psychologie : Cognition, Comportement, Communication France
Early Intervention Foundation United Kingdom
Institute of Physics United Kingdom
Artevelde University College Ghent Belgium
Karakter Netherlands
Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Switzerland
Laboratoire Cognitions Humaine et Artificielle France
Laboratoire d'étude de l'apprentissage et du développement France
Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs France
Peabody relative to Psykiatrien i Region Syddanmark Denmark Psykiatrien i Region Syddanmark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.8×
Psykiatrien i Region Syddanmark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Peabody

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Peabody. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Peabody with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peabody more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Peabody

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Peabody at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Peabody at the time of their publication.

About Peabody

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Peabody have published 526 papers, which have received a total of 25.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 191 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 201 papers in Education, 55 papers in Statistics and Probability, 55 papers in Safety Research and 74 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (77 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (73 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (51 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (41 papers), Disability Education and Employment (41 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (38 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (36 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (10.0k citations), Sensory Systems (3.3k citations), Safety Research (3.4k citations), Statistics and Probability (2.7k citations) and Education (9.5k citations). Authors at Peabody collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan and have published in prestigious journals including Peabody Journal of Education, Exceptional Children, Journal of Community Psychology, American Educational Research Journal and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. Some of Peabody's most productive authors include Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, M. Charles Liberman, Sharon G. Kujawa, Kathleen Lynne Lane, Carol L. Hamlett, Leonard Bickman, Joseph H. Wehby, Robert T. Jiménez and Ellen Brantlinger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact