Polish Academy of Sciences

1.9M citations
97.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Polish Academy of Sciences

90.9k papers receiving 1.8M citations

Peers

Polish Academy of Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Biological Psychiatry 16.7k
  • Materials Chemistry 327.3k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 78.8k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 119.5k
  • Organic Chemistry 143.8k
Replace University of Vienna with:
University of Vienna Austria
Technische Universität Dresden Germany
Hungarian Academy of Sciences Hungary
Uppsala University Sweden
Jagiellonian University Poland
Freie Universität Berlin Germany
Charles University Czechia
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Germany
University of Copenhagen Denmark
University of Helsinki Finland
Polish Academy of Sciences relative to University of Vienna Austria University of Vienna's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
University of Vienna · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Polish Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Polish Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Polish Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polish Academy of Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Polish Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Polish Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Polish Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Polish Academy of Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Polish Academy of Sciences have published 97.5k papers, which have received a total of 1.9M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6.2k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 8.0k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 16.6k papers in Materials Chemistry, 10.0k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2.6k papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry on the topics of Rare-earth and actinide compounds (2.0k papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (1.9k papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (1.9k papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (1.7k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1.6k papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1.6k papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1.6k papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (16.7k citations), Materials Chemistry (327.3k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (78.8k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (119.5k citations) and Organic Chemistry (143.8k citations). Authors at Polish Academy of Sciences collaborate with scholars in Poland, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Alloys and Compounds, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, physica status solidi (b), Scientific Reports and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Some of Polish Academy of Sciences's most productive authors include Witold Pedrycz, T. Dietl, Janusz Kacprzyk, Andrzej L. Sobolewski, A. Jabłoński, Jacek Oleksyn, Jerzy Zabczyk, Peter B. Reich, Daniel T. Gryko and Ryszard Amarowicz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact