Technische Universität Dresden

2.6M citations
93.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Technische Universität Dresden

87.5k papers receiving 2.6M citations

Peers

Technische Universität Dresden
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 17.4k
  • Sensory Systems 22.8k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 13.6k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 232.5k
  • Materials Chemistry 172.2k
Replace Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München with:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Germany
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Germany
Freie Universität Berlin Germany
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Germany
University of Regensburg Germany
Technical University of Munich Germany
University of Göttingen Germany
University of Würzburg Germany
Lund University Sweden
University of Vienna Austria
Technische Universität Dresden relative to Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Germany Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Technische Universität Dresden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Technische Universität Dresden. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Technische Universität Dresden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technische Universität Dresden more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Technische Universität Dresden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Technische Universität Dresden at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Technische Universität Dresden at the time of their publication.

About Technische Universität Dresden

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Technische Universität Dresden have published 93.3k papers, which have received a total of 2.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.1k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 874 papers in Sensory Systems, 9.1k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 403 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience and 1.1k papers in Hardware and Architecture on the topics of Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (795 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (695 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (691 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (648 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (640 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (600 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (596 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (591 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Behavioral Neuroscience (17.4k citations), Sensory Systems (22.8k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (13.6k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (232.5k citations) and Materials Chemistry (172.2k citations). Authors at Technische Universität Dresden collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, Physical review. B., PLoS ONE, Nature Communications and Physical Review Letters. Some of Technische Universität Dresden's most productive authors include Stefan Kaskel, Jürgen T. Rehm, Xinliang Feng, Karl Leo, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Dirk Helbing, Gerhard Paul Fettweis, Gotthard Seifert, Clemens Kirschbaum and Thomas R. Hummel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact