KTH Royal Institute of Technology

2.4M citations
82.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

77.1k papers receiving 2.3M citations

Peers

KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Biomaterials 116.4k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 128.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 347.9k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 420.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 282.8k
Replace Uppsala University with:
Uppsala University Sweden
Chalmers University of Technology Sweden
Technical University of Denmark Denmark
Linköping University Sweden
Polish Academy of Sciences Poland
Aalto University Finland
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway
Technische Universität Berlin Germany
Technische Universität Dresden Germany
Aarhus University Denmark
KTH Royal Institute of Technology relative to Uppsala University Sweden Uppsala University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Uppsala University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at KTH Royal Institute of Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KTH Royal Institute of Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with KTH Royal Institute of Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with KTH Royal Institute of Technology at the time of their publication.

About KTH Royal Institute of Technology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with KTH Royal Institute of Technology have published 82.7k papers, which have received a total of 2.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 16.9k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 8.0k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 6.1k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 8.2k papers in Mechanical Engineering and 9.9k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (1.6k papers), Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization (1.3k papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (1.2k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.2k papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (1.1k papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (1.1k papers), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (1.1k papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.0k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biomaterials (116.4k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (128.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (347.9k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (420.1k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (282.8k citations). Authors at KTH Royal Institute of Technology collaborate with scholars in Sweden, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review B, Scientific Reports and Physical Review Letters. Some of KTH Royal Institute of Technology's most productive authors include Gunnar von Heijne, Licheng Sun, Waloddi Weibull, Karl Henrik Johansson, Tony Lindeberg, Ann‐Christine Albertsson, Mats Hillert, Mathias Uhlén, Göran Lindblad and Lihui Wang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact