Charles University

2M citations
94.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Charles University

88.7k papers receiving 2M citations

Peers

Charles University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 45.2k
  • Geophysics 41.2k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 49.6k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 60.6k
  • Electrochemistry 8.7k
Replace Technical University of Munich with:
Technical University of Munich Germany
University of Vienna Austria
Czech Academy of Sciences Czechia
Freie Universität Berlin Germany
University of Göttingen Germany
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Germany
Lund University Sweden
Friedrich Schiller University Jena Germany
University of Padua Italy
University of Tübingen Germany
Charles University relative to Technical University of Munich Germany Technical University of Munich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Technical University of Munich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Charles University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Charles University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Charles University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Charles University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Charles University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Charles University at the time of their publication.

About Charles University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Charles University have published 94.7k papers, which have received a total of 2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 613 papers in Electrochemistry, 2.8k papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 648 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 1.7k papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 2.8k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics on the topics of Advanced Graph Theory Research (1.1k papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (1k papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (926 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (793 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (744 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (661 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (613 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (575 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (45.2k citations), Geophysics (41.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (49.6k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (60.6k citations) and Electrochemistry (8.7k citations). Authors at Charles University collaborate with scholars in Czechia, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Physiological Research, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Journal of Chromatography A. Some of Charles University's most productive authors include Petr Pyšek, Jiřı́ Matoušek, Ladislav Krištoufek, David Vokrouhlický, Milan Holeček, David M. Richardson, Jaroslav Flegr A, Eva Syková, Ivana Cı́sařová and Vojtĕch Jaros̆ı́k.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact