American Thoracic Society

24.2k citations
309 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

American Thoracic Society

243 papers receiving 20.9k citations

Peers

American Thoracic Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 8.7k
  • Small Animals 1.5k
  • Microbiology 145
  • Epidemiology 5.6k
  • Physiology 3.9k
Replace Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé with:
Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Canada
Carney Hospital United States
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Canada
GlaxoSmithKline (Canada) Canada
Statistics Collaborative United States
Vermont Oxford Network United States
Massachusetts Academy of Math and Science at WPI United States
St Joseph's Hospital Health Center United States
MetroWest Medical Center United States
Reckitt Benckiser (United States) United States
American Thoracic Society relative to Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Canada Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Thoracic Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Thoracic Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Thoracic Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Thoracic Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Thoracic Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Thoracic Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Thoracic Society at the time of their publication.

About American Thoracic Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Thoracic Society have published 309 papers, which have received a total of 24.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 94 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 14 papers in Emergency Medicine, 20 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 32 papers in Physiology on the topics of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (33 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (25 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (17 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (12 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (11 papers) and Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (8.7k citations), Small Animals (1.5k citations), Microbiology (145 citations), Epidemiology (5.6k citations) and Physiology (3.9k citations). Authors at American Thoracic Society collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of the American Thoracic Society, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, CHEST Journal, New England Journal of Medicine and Critical Care Medicine. Some of American Thoracic Society's most productive authors include A. Sonia Buist, Christine Jenkins, Suzanne S. Hurd, Peter Calverley, Romain Pauwels, Charles L. Daley, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Richard J. Wallace, Kevin Winthrop and Steven M. Holland.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact