National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Impact in
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Otorhinolaryngology top 5%
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Papers in
- Oncology 136
- Cancer survivorship and care 22
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 20
- Hematology 36
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research 15
- Top scholars
- William T. McGivneyThomas Anthony D’AmicoJoyce C. NilandRobert W. CarlsonJoan S. McClureDavid F CellaJonathan L. VandergriftDiane B. Paul
- Journals
- Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (261 papers)Cancer (9 papers)Blood (4 papers)JCO Oncology Practice (4 papers)Journal of Oncology Practice (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
299 papers receiving 49.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
- Oncology 17.0k
- Otorhinolaryngology 1.9k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 13.0k
- Cancer Research 5.3k
- Hematology 3.7k
Countries citing scholars working at National Comprehensive Cancer Network
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Comprehensive Cancer Network. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Comprehensive Cancer Network with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Comprehensive Cancer Network more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Comprehensive Cancer Network
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Comprehensive Cancer Network at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Comprehensive Cancer Network at the time of their publication.
About National Comprehensive Cancer Network
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Comprehensive Cancer Network have published 346 papers, which have received a total of 57.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 136 papers in Oncology, 36 papers in Hematology, 31 papers in Genetics, 42 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 72 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (39 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (28 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (24 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (24 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (22 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (20 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (19 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oncology (17.0k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (1.9k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (13.0k citations), Cancer Research (5.3k citations) and Hematology (3.7k citations). Authors at National Comprehensive Cancer Network collaborate with scholars in United States, India and South Africa and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Cancer, Blood, JCO Oncology Practice and Journal of Oncology Practice. Some of National Comprehensive Cancer Network's most productive authors include William T. McGivney, Thomas Anthony D’Amico, Joyce C. Niland, Robert W. Carlson, Joan S. McClure, David F Cella, Jonathan L. Vandergrift, Diane B. Paul, Rodger J. Winn and Herman E. Kattlove.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.