Organization for Tropical Studies

17.2k citations
365 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Organization for Tropical Studies

330 papers receiving 17.0k citations

Peers

Organization for Tropical Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Ecological Modeling 4.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 7.0k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 5.6k
  • Global and Planetary Change 5.9k
  • Ecology 6.0k
Replace Guanacaste Conservation Area with:
Guanacaste Conservation Area Costa Rica
University of Belize Belize
National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity Mexico
National Archives of Ecuador Ecuador
International Institute of Tropical Forestry Puerto Rico
Universidad Nacional Experimental de los Llanos Occidentales Ezequiel Zamora Venezuela
Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí Panama
Invasive Plant Research Laboratory United States
Instituto Tecnológico de Chetumal Mexico
Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy United States
Organization for Tropical Studies relative to Guanacaste Conservation Area Costa Rica Guanacaste Conservation Area's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Guanacaste Conservation Area · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Organization for Tropical Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Organization for Tropical Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Organization for Tropical Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organization for Tropical Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Organization for Tropical Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Organization for Tropical Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Organization for Tropical Studies at the time of their publication.

About Organization for Tropical Studies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Organization for Tropical Studies have published 365 papers, which have received a total of 17.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 56 papers in Ecological Modeling, 126 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 146 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 23 papers in Forestry and 96 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Plant and animal studies (102 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (99 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (56 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (38 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (35 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (30 papers), Forest ecology and management (29 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (4.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (7.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (5.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (5.9k citations) and Ecology (6.0k citations). Authors at Organization for Tropical Studies collaborate with scholars in Costa Rica, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Biotropica, Oecologia, Forest Ecology and Management, PLoS ONE and Ecology. Some of Organization for Tropical Studies's most productive authors include J. Alan Pounds, Rakan A. Zahawi, Jeff Price, Cynthia Rosenzweig, Stephen H. Schneider, Terry L. Root, Kimberly R. Hall, Karen D. Holl, John H. Campbell and David B. Clark.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact