National Archives of Ecuador

3.0k citations
290 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Archives of Ecuador

200 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

National Archives of Ecuador
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 987
  • Ecological Modeling 241
  • Global and Planetary Change 832
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 638
  • Forestry 115
Replace Instituto Sinchi with:
Instituto Sinchi Colombia
ProPacífico Colombia
Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Ecuador
Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí Panama
Universidad Nacional Experimental de los Llanos Occidentales Ezequiel Zamora Venezuela
Guanacaste Conservation Area Costa Rica
Consortium for Sustainable Development of the Andean Ecoregion Peru
Universidad Nacional de Tumbes Peru
Corporación Universitaria Lasallista Colombia
Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad Peru
National Archives of Ecuador relative to Instituto Sinchi Colombia Instituto Sinchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Instituto Sinchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Archives of Ecuador

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Archives of Ecuador. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Archives of Ecuador with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Archives of Ecuador more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Archives of Ecuador

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Archives of Ecuador at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Archives of Ecuador at the time of their publication.

About National Archives of Ecuador

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Archives of Ecuador have published 290 papers, which have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 32 papers in Law, 13 papers in Computer Science Applications, 2 papers in Horticulture, 8 papers in Ecological Modeling and 54 papers in Education on the topics of Business, Innovation, and Economy (29 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (28 papers), Social Issues and Policies in Latin America (19 papers), Education and Teacher Training (18 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Educational Methods and Psychological Studies (13 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (987 citations), Ecological Modeling (241 citations), Global and Planetary Change (832 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (638 citations) and Forestry (115 citations). Authors at National Archives of Ecuador collaborate with scholars in Ecuador, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Ecology, Phytotaxa, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Ecology and Evolution and PLoS ONE. Some of National Archives of Ecuador's most productive authors include David Neill, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Walter A. Palacios, Milton Aulestia, Carlos Cerón, Miles R. Silman, John Terborgh, Percy Núñez, Timothy R. Baker and Oliver L. Phillips.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact