International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 129
- Forest ecology and management 77
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 54
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 43
- Top scholars
- Ariel E. LugoMichael KellerJoseph M. WunderleJohn A. ParrottaRebecca OstertagWhendee L. SilverA. E. LugoEileen H. Helmer
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (39 papers)Biotropica (29 papers)Forests (27 papers)Remote Sensing of Environment (13 papers)Ecosystems (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- Puerto RicoUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
700 papers receiving 44.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 11.7k
- Global and Planetary Change 10.4k
- Ecology 10.4k
- Soil Science 5.7k
- Environmental Engineering 4.1k
Countries citing scholars working at International Institute of Tropical Forestry
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at International Institute of Tropical Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at International Institute of Tropical Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Institute of Tropical Forestry more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at International Institute of Tropical Forestry
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with International Institute of Tropical Forestry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with International Institute of Tropical Forestry at the time of their publication.
About International Institute of Tropical Forestry
In recent decades, authors affiliated with International Institute of Tropical Forestry have published 720 papers, which have received a total of 44.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 188 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 190 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 107 papers in Soil Science, 168 papers in Ecology and 60 papers in Environmental Engineering on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (129 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (98 papers), Forest ecology and management (77 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (57 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (54 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (51 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (43 papers) and Environmental and biological studies (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (11.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (10.4k citations), Ecology (10.4k citations), Soil Science (5.7k citations) and Environmental Engineering (4.1k citations). Authors at International Institute of Tropical Forestry collaborate with scholars in Puerto Rico, United States and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Biotropica, Forests, Remote Sensing of Environment and Ecosystems. Some of International Institute of Tropical Forestry's most productive authors include Ariel E. Lugo, Michael Keller, Joseph M. Wunderle, John A. Parrotta, Rebecca Ostertag, Whendee L. Silver, A. E. Lugo, Eileen H. Helmer, Manuel R. Guariguata and F. N. Scatena.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.