National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 92
- Ecology 212
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 59
- Remote Sensing in Agriculture 43
- Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies 34
- Top scholars
- Jorge SoberónA. Townsend PetersonPatricia KoleffJack J. LennonKevin J. GastonRené R. ColditzMélanie KolbJean‐François Mas
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (15 papers)Biological Conservation (8 papers)Remote Sensing (8 papers)Journal of Environmental Management (7 papers)Forests (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity
430 papers receiving 13.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
- Ecological Modeling 3.6k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.6k
- Ecology 5.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 3.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.3k
Countries citing scholars working at National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity at the time of their publication.
About National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity have published 473 papers, which have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 92 papers in Ecological Modeling, 212 papers in Ecology, 81 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 122 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 49 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Species Distribution and Climate Change (92 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (61 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (59 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (47 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (43 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (34 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (28 papers) and Plant and animal studies (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (3.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.6k citations), Ecology (5.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.6k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.3k citations). Authors at National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity collaborate with scholars in Mexico, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Biological Conservation, Remote Sensing, Journal of Environmental Management and Forests. Some of National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity's most productive authors include Jorge Soberón, A. Townsend Peterson, Patricia Koleff, Jack J. Lennon, Kevin J. Gaston, René R. Colditz, Mélanie Kolb, Jean‐François Mas, Luis Valderrama-Landeros and Rainer Ressl.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.