Invasive Plant Research Laboratory

10.3k citations
447 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Invasive Plant Research Laboratory

435 papers receiving 10.0k citations

Peers

Invasive Plant Research Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Insect Science 5.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.1k
  • Plant Science 4.3k
  • Ecology 2.6k
Replace Instituto de Ecologia y Sistemática with:
Instituto de Ecologia y Sistemática Cuba
Florida State Collection of Arthropods United States
Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative United States
National Soil Dynamics Research Laboratory United States
Foreign Agricultural Service United States
National Peanut Research Laboratory United States
Aquatic Animal Health Research Laboratory United States
University Press of Florida United States
ForestGEO United States
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission United States
Invasive Plant Research Laboratory relative to Instituto de Ecologia y Sistemática Cuba Instituto de Ecologia y Sistemática's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Instituto de Ecologia y Sistemática · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Invasive Plant Research Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Invasive Plant Research Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Invasive Plant Research Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Invasive Plant Research Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Invasive Plant Research Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Invasive Plant Research Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Invasive Plant Research Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Invasive Plant Research Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Invasive Plant Research Laboratory have published 447 papers, which have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 345 papers in Insect Science, 173 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 94 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 187 papers in Plant Science and 97 papers in Ecology on the topics of Biological Control of Invasive Species (291 papers), Plant and animal studies (133 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (89 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (73 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (71 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (70 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (47 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (5.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.1k citations), Plant Science (4.3k citations) and Ecology (2.6k citations). Authors at Invasive Plant Research Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, Australia and China and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Control, Biocontrol Science and Technology, Environmental Entomology, Aquatic Botany and BioControl. Some of Invasive Plant Research Laboratory's most productive authors include Robert W. Pemberton, Gregory S. Wheeler, Peter Stiling, Hong Liu, Philip W. Tipping, Aaron S. David, Christopher A. Searcy, Eric S. Menges, Michelle E. Afkhami and Damian J. Hernandez.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact