Louisiana Tech University

5.5k papers receiving 151.8k citations

Peers

Louisiana Tech University
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 4.3k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 12.9k
  • Biomaterials 15.5k
  • Information Systems and Management 6.5k
  • Marketing 8.1k
Replace The University of Texas at Arlington with:
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
University of New Orleans United States
The University of Texas at Dallas United States
Texas State University United States
University of Southern Mississippi United States
Wichita State University United States
Louisiana State University in Shreveport United States
University of Arkansas at Little Rock United States
Texas Christian University United States
Temple College United States
Louisiana Tech University relative to The University of Texas at Arlington United States The University of Texas at Arlington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
The University of Texas at Arlington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Louisiana Tech University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Louisiana Tech University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Louisiana Tech University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louisiana Tech University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Louisiana Tech University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Louisiana Tech University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Louisiana Tech University at the time of their publication.

About Louisiana Tech University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Louisiana Tech University have published 6.1k papers, which have received a total of 158.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 89 papers in Architecture, 83 papers in Complementary and Manual Therapy, 179 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 134 papers in Bioengineering and 268 papers in Accounting on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (182 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (157 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (147 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (134 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (110 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (102 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (102 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (95 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Complementary and Manual Therapy (4.3k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (12.9k citations), Biomaterials (15.5k citations), Information Systems and Management (6.5k citations) and Marketing (8.1k citations). Authors at Louisiana Tech University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Business Research, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Journal of Employment Counseling, The Journal of Chemical Physics and The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Some of Louisiana Tech University's most productive authors include Yuri Lvov, Barry J. Babin, Kenny S. Crump, Marcia J. Simmering, Orlando C. Richard, Elshad Abdullayev, Ali F. Darrat, Rawil Fakhrullin, Weizhong Dai and Michael J. McShane.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact