University of Arkansas at Little Rock

6.7k papers receiving 168.7k citations

Peers

University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Clinical Psychology 11.6k
  • Communication 3.3k
  • Biomedical Engineering 18.2k
  • Health 3.0k
  • Social Psychology 7.9k
Replace Louisiana Tech University with:
Louisiana Tech University United States
Missouri State University United States
Williams (United States) United States
Wichita State University United States
Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City United States
University of Southern Mississippi United States
University of South Alabama United States
Illinois College United States
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville United States
Western Kentucky University United States
University of Arkansas at Little Rock relative to Louisiana Tech University United States Louisiana Tech University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Louisiana Tech University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Arkansas at Little Rock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Arkansas at Little Rock. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Arkansas at Little Rock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Arkansas at Little Rock more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Arkansas at Little Rock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Arkansas at Little Rock at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Arkansas at Little Rock at the time of their publication.

About University of Arkansas at Little Rock

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Arkansas at Little Rock have published 7.7k papers, which have received a total of 184.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 179 papers in Communication, 192 papers in Signal Processing, 329 papers in Clinical Psychology, 378 papers in Information Systems and 116 papers in Health on the topics of Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (148 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (117 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (109 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (103 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (96 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (95 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (92 papers) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (89 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (11.6k citations), Communication (3.3k citations), Biomedical Engineering (18.2k citations), Health (3.0k citations) and Social Psychology (7.9k citations). Authors at University of Arkansas at Little Rock collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Particulate Science And Technology, BMC Bioinformatics, PLoS ONE and Experimental Biology and Medicine. Some of University of Arkansas at Little Rock's most productive authors include Robert S. Sikes, Robert H. Bradley, Robert F. Corwyn, William L. Gannon, Alexandru S. Biris, Xiu Ye, Brent B. Benda, Robert H. Bradley, Shucheng Yu and Enkeleda Dervishi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact