Lingnan University

37.4k citations
2.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Lingnan University

1.6k papers receiving 34.3k citations

Peers

Lingnan University
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 5.9k
  • Accounting 5.3k
  • Marketing 3.6k
  • Strategy and Management 5.9k
  • Finance 2.3k
Replace Hong Kong Metropolitan University with:
Hong Kong Metropolitan University Hong Kong
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies China
Hang Seng University of Hong Kong Hong Kong
National Chi Nan University Taiwan
Hong Kong Shue Yan University China
National Taichung University of Science and Technology Taiwan
National Changhua University of Education Taiwan
Ming Chuan University Taiwan
National Economics University Vietnam
Macao Polytechnic University Macao
Lingnan University relative to Hong Kong Metropolitan University Hong Kong Hong Kong Metropolitan University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Hong Kong Metropolitan University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Lingnan University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Lingnan University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Lingnan University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lingnan University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Lingnan University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Lingnan University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Lingnan University at the time of their publication.

About Lingnan University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Lingnan University have published 2.2k papers, which have received a total of 37.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 178 papers in Accounting, 161 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 128 papers in Finance, 168 papers in Strategy and Management and 95 papers in Marketing on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (104 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (93 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (63 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (41 papers), Global trade and economics (41 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (39 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (38 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (5.9k citations), Accounting (5.3k citations), Marketing (3.6k citations), Strategy and Management (5.9k citations) and Finance (2.3k citations). Authors at Lingnan University collaborate with scholars in Hong Kong, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Production and Operations Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Scientific Reports, Pacific Economic Review and The Accounting Review. Some of Lingnan University's most productive authors include Oi Ling Siu, Dean Tjosvold, Chen Lin, William E. Shafer, David R. Phillips, Geng Cui, Andrew Goatly, Michael A. Firth, Sheung‐Tak Cheng and Hon‐Kwong Lui.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact