William E. Shafer

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

William E. Shafer
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Information Systems and Management 679
  • Accounting 507
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 368
  • Strategy and Management 513
  • Marketing 250
Replace Linda Thorne with:
Linda Thorne Canada
Diana C. Robertson United States
Gary M. Fleischman United States
John R. Boatright United States
Christopher J. Robertson United States
Gene Brown United States
Danielle E. Warren United States
Alejo José G. Sisón Spain
Patrick Maclagan United Kingdom
Justin G. Longenecker United States
William E. Shafer relative to Linda Thorne Canada Linda Thorne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Linda Thorne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Shafer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Shafer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Shafer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Shafer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Shafer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Shafer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Shafer. The network helps show where William E. Shafer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside William E. Shafer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Shafer Line = papers co-authored together William E. Shafer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006206
2 2001134
3 2013115
4 2007111
5 200897
6 200095
7 200782
8 200671
9 200269
10 200267
11 200965
12 200553
13 201150
14 201139
15 199738
16 201632
17 200929
18 201727
19 200227
20 200226

About William E. Shafer

William E. Shafer is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Accounting, Strategy and Management, Safety Research and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (22 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (11 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers) and Corruption and Economic Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (679 citations), Accounting (507 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (368 citations), Strategy and Management (513 citations) and Marketing (250 citations). William E. Shafer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Simmons, Kyoko Fukukawa, Zhihong Wang, Jerry R. Strawser, Yves Gendron, Woody M. Liao, Dean Tjosvold, Lorenzo Lucianetti, Robin Stanley Snell and Timothy J. Fogarty. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Journal of Education for Business, Managerial Auditing Journal and Business Ethics A European Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact