Ludwig Cancer Research

315.5k citations
2.2k papers ·

Impact in

  • Genetics top 1%
    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
    • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics

Papers in

    • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 220
    • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses 312
    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology 91

Ludwig Cancer Research

2.2k papers receiving 315.3k citations

Peers

Ludwig Cancer Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Genetics 24.6k
  • Cell Biology 29.6k
  • Immunology 40.8k
  • Oncology 46.6k
  • Neurology 22.3k
Replace The Wistar Institute with:
The Wistar Institute United States
Abramson Cancer Center United States
Harvard Stem Cell Institute United States
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center United States
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory United States
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases United States
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT United States
Biogen (United States) United States
Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute Canada
Regeneron (United States) United States
Ludwig Cancer Research relative to The Wistar Institute United States The Wistar Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
The Wistar Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ludwig Cancer Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ludwig Cancer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ludwig Cancer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludwig Cancer Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ludwig Cancer Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ludwig Cancer Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ludwig Cancer Research at the time of their publication.

About Ludwig Cancer Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ludwig Cancer Research have published 2.2k papers, which have received a total of 315.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 315 papers in Cell Biology, 407 papers in Immunology, 325 papers in Oncology, 96 papers in Genetics and 147 papers in Cancer Research on the topics of Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (312 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (220 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (169 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (109 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (107 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (91 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (87 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (76 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Genetics (24.6k citations), Cell Biology (29.6k citations), Immunology (40.8k citations), Oncology (46.6k citations) and Neurology (22.3k citations). Authors at Ludwig Cancer Research collaborate with scholars in United States, Belgium and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature, The Journal of Cell Biology, International Journal of Cancer and Journal of Biological Chemistry. Some of Ludwig Cancer Research's most productive authors include Don W. Cleveland, Lloyd J. Old, Robert Schreiber, Webster K. Cavenee, Bing Ren, David N. Louis, Gavin P. Dunn, Arshad B. Desai, Mark John Smyth and Yao‐Tseng Chen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact