University of San Diego

379.6k citations
12.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of San Diego

10.4k papers receiving 333.6k citations

Peers

University of San Diego
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 20.0k
  • Biological Psychiatry 2.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 12.0k
  • Virology 3.8k
  • Neurology 6.7k
Replace Irvine University with:
Irvine University United States
UCLA Health United States
San Diego State University United States
California Southern University United States
University of Nevada, Las Vegas United States
Palo Alto University United States
University of San Francisco United States
University of Nevada, Reno United States
Menlo School United States
University of California System United States
University of San Diego relative to Irvine University United States Irvine University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Irvine University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of San Diego

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of San Diego. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of San Diego with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of San Diego more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of San Diego

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of San Diego at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of San Diego at the time of their publication.

About University of San Diego

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of San Diego have published 12.5k papers, which have received a total of 379.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 91 papers in Architecture, 568 papers in Clinical Psychology, 22 papers in Research and Theory, 270 papers in Law and 471 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (139 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (137 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (124 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (113 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (107 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (101 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (100 papers) and Engineering Education and Pedagogy (90 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (20.0k citations), Biological Psychiatry (2.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (12.0k citations), Virology (3.8k citations) and Neurology (6.7k citations). Authors at University of San Diego collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Laryngoscope, The Journal of Immunology, Anesthesiology, American Journal of Roentgenology and The FASEB Journal. Some of University of San Diego's most productive authors include Mary L. McHugh, Richard Daneman, Alexandre Prat, Peter H. Reingen, Zhi‐Yong Yin, Larry Alexander, Pavel A. Pevzner, Stephen M. Stahl, J. Reid Meloy and J. C. de la Torre.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact