Indiana University of Pennsylvania

76.3k citations
4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 66
  • Health 115
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence 86

Indiana University of Pennsylvania

3.7k papers receiving 76.2k citations

Peers

Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Health 4.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 8.4k
  • Education 7.8k
  • Social Psychology 4.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 9.3k
Replace Duquesne University with:
Duquesne University United States
Trent University Canada
James Madison University United States
Catholic University of America United States
Bucknell University United States
Eastern Michigan University United States
Villanova University United States
Towson University United States
Cleveland State University United States
University of Windsor Canada
Indiana University of Pennsylvania relative to Duquesne University United States Duquesne University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Duquesne University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Indiana University of Pennsylvania. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Indiana University of Pennsylvania with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indiana University of Pennsylvania more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Indiana University of Pennsylvania at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Indiana University of Pennsylvania at the time of their publication.

About Indiana University of Pennsylvania

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Indiana University of Pennsylvania have published 4k papers, which have received a total of 76.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 528 papers in Education, 115 papers in Health, 21 papers in Leadership and Management, 42 papers in Research and Theory and 149 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology on the topics of Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (88 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (86 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (84 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (75 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (74 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (72 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (66 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (57 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (4.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (8.4k citations), Education (7.8k citations), Social Psychology (4.1k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (9.3k citations). Authors at Indiana University of Pennsylvania collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Early Childhood Education Journal, Nurse Educator, Teaching and learning in nursing, Foreign Language Annals and Journal of Counseling & Development. Some of Indiana University of Pennsylvania's most productive authors include Krzysztof Z. Kaniasty, Edward W. Gondolf, Fran H. Norris, Abbas J. Ali, Katherine L. Farnsworth, John D. Milliman, David I. Hanauer, James Allen Rodger, Mary Renck Jalongo and Kathleen J. Hanrahan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact