Foreign Language Annals

2.1k papers and 32.5k indexed citations

About

The 2.1k papers published in Foreign Language Annals in the last decades have received a total of 32.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Foreign Language Annals usually cover Language and Linguistics (1.4k papers), Literature and Literary Theory (990 papers) and Linguistics and Language (544 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1.3k papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (840 papers) and Multilingual Education and Policy (475 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Foreign Language Annals are Dolly J. Young, Elaine K. Horwitz, Renate A. Schulz, Lina Lee, Ilona Leki, Yuh‐show Cheng, Heather W. Allen, Laurens Vandergrift, Orlando R. Kelm and Greg Kessler.

In The Last Decade

Foreign Language Annals

1.7k papers receiving 26.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Foreign Language Annals

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Foreign Language Annals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Foreign Language Annals.

Countries where authors publish in Foreign Language Annals

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Foreign Language Annals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Foreign Language Annals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foreign Language Annals more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026