US Forest Service

709.5k citations
18.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

US Forest Service

16.9k papers receiving 689.4k citations

Peers

US Forest Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 189.6k
  • Global and Planetary Change 289.3k
  • Ecology 245.9k
  • Ecological Modeling 37.9k
  • Soil Science 55.6k
Replace Environmental Protection Agency with:
Environmental Protection Agency United States
United States Department of Agriculture United States
Agricultural Research Service United States
United States Geological Survey United States
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration United States
The Nature Conservancy United States
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies United States
Canadian Forest Service Canada
Natural Resources Canada Canada
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States
US Forest Service relative to Environmental Protection Agency United States Environmental Protection Agency's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Environmental Protection Agency · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at US Forest Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at US Forest Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at US Forest Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites US Forest Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at US Forest Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with US Forest Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with US Forest Service at the time of their publication.

About US Forest Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with US Forest Service have published 18.0k papers, which have received a total of 709.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.1k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 6.6k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 6.3k papers in Ecology, 2.6k papers in Insect Science and 812 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Fire effects on ecosystems (3.1k papers), Forest ecology and management (2.3k papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2.1k papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.9k papers), Forest Management and Policy (1.6k papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (1.4k papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1.4k papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1.2k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (189.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (289.3k citations), Ecology (245.9k citations), Ecological Modeling (37.9k citations) and Soil Science (55.6k citations). Authors at US Forest Service collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Forestry, Forest Science, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry and Journal of Economic Entomology. Some of US Forest Service's most productive authors include Melvin T. Tyree, Andrew M. Liebhold, David J. Nowak, Ariel E. Lugo, Samuel A. Cushman, J. Morgan Grove, Frederick C. Meinzer, Robert J. Moon, Louis R. Iverson and Ronald E. McRoberts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact