United Nations

85.2k citations
4.6k papers ·

Impact in

    • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
    • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Demography top 2%
    • Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

Papers in

United Nations

4k papers receiving 85.1k citations

Peers

United Nations
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Infectious Diseases 5.2k
  • Demography 3.2k
  • Modeling and Simulation 1.3k
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2.4k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 3.2k
Replace Baruch College with:
Baruch College United States
World Bank Group United States
United States Agency for International Development United States
United Nations Children's Fund United States
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine United States
National Academy of Sciences United States
Pace University United States
Brookings Institution United States
International Food Policy Research Institute United States
RTI International United States
United Nations relative to Baruch College United States Baruch College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Baruch College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United Nations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Nations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Nations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United Nations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Nations at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Nations at the time of their publication.

About United Nations

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Nations have published 4.6k papers, which have received a total of 85.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 951 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 291 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 79 papers in Development, 158 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 815 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of International Law and Human Rights (335 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (145 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (128 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (96 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (95 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (77 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (71 papers) and International Development and Aid (71 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (5.2k citations), Demography (3.2k citations), Modeling and Simulation (1.3k citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (2.4k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (3.2k citations). Authors at United Nations collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of International Law, The Lancet, PLoS ONE, Nature and World Development. Some of United Nations's most productive authors include David Le Blanc, Hans Joachim Haubold, Arak M. Mathai, Danan Gu, Rajib Shaw, Patrick Gerland, Inge Kaul, Nazzareno Diodato, Teresa Castro Martín and Jan Eliasson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact